|
KMID : 1141920220380040319
|
|
Annals of Coloproctology
2022 Volume.38 No. 4 p.319 ~ p.326
|
|
|
Comparison of blowhole colostomy and loop ostomy for palliation of acute malignant colonic obstruction
|
|
Park Yong-Jun
Choi Dong-Uk
Kim Hyung-Ook
Kim Yong-Bog
Min Chung-Ki
Son Jung-Tack
Lee Sung-Ryol
Jung Kyung-Uk
Kim Hung-Dai
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: Surgery to create a stoma for decompression might be required for unresectable stage IV cancer patients with complete colonic obstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the results of blowhole colostomy with those of loop ostomy.
Methods: Palliative ileostomy or colostomy procedures performed at a single center between January 2011 and October 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-nine patients were identified during this period. The demographic characteristics and outcomes between the blowhole colostomy group (n=24) and the loop ostomy group (n=35) were compared.
Results: The median operative time tended to be shorter in the blowhole colostomy group (52.5 minutes; interquartile range [IQR], 43?65) than in the loop ostomy group (60 minutes; IQR, 40?107), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.162). The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter with blowhole colostomy (blowhole, 13 days [IQR, 9?23]; loop, 21 days [IQR, 14?37]; P=0.013). Mean cecum diameter was significantly larger in the blowhole group than in the loop group (8.83±1.91 cm vs. 6.78±2.36 cm, P=0.001), and the emergency operation rate was higher in the blowhole group than in the loop group (22 of 24 [91.7%] vs. 23 of 35 [65.7%], P=0.021).
Conclusion: In surgical emergencies, diverting a blowhole colostomy can be safe and effective for palliative management of colonic obstruction in patients with end-stage cancer and might reduce the operative time in emergent situations.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Ileostomy, Cecostomy, Colostomy, Intestinal obstruction, Palliative care
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
  
|
|